See how saturated a Notion template category already is, and what comparable templates actually sell for elsewhere — so you build where there is room, not where everyone already is. No sign-up, no card.
Two independent things matter when you choose what to build. The first is how many templates already exist in a category — read from the public Notion Template Gallery, which publishes a result count per category. The second is what comparable templates are priced at on the open market, read from public Gumroad product pages tagged for Notion templates.
The interesting combination is a category with real interest but a thin, cheap supply. That is where a well-made template has room. The opposite case — thousands of existing templates, all priced low — is a category where you are competing on volume against people who got there first.
Notion's gallery lists templates but does not publish a usable price distribution across a category. Gumroad does: its public product pages carry real prices and real rating counts. Using it means the monetisability signal comes from actual listed prices rather than from a guess.
It does not report how many copies any template has sold, or what any creator earns. Neither Notion nor Gumroad publishes per-product sales figures, so nothing here estimates them. Rating counts are shown as a popularity proxy and labelled as such, never as sales.
From the public Notion Template Gallery category pages, which show a result count per category. It is collected weekly and the collection date appears in the basis line under every score.
Not necessarily. A large category is also evidence of durable demand. It means you need a sharper angle — a specific profession or workflow — rather than a general-purpose template competing head-on with thousands of others.
Not yet. Only categories with real collected data appear, so that no result is ever shown for a category the tool has not actually measured.